Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Intel Penryn

The "Penryn" is Intel's upcoming 45nm process based architecture. The first planned models will come in dual-core & quad-core flavors with each core clocked at 3 Ghz or higher, depending upon the price of the product. Amazingly Intel has found a way to cram as much as 24 MB of L2 cache into on of their quad-core versions of the new processor.

Will Intel retain it's crown for the next generation of processors?

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

OCZ Neural Impulse Actuator

Mind Control? In video games? That's not supposed to happen for years. It looks like OCZ threw that assumption out the window with their brand new NIA mind control solution. The NIA measures the electro-oculographic, electro-encephalographic, and electro-myographic signals of your brain to know how to react in game. My Latin and root word knowledge is quite limited, but it looks like the first one deals with your eyes, the second with your head, and the third with your facial muscles. It is reported that OCZ's NIA system currently works with games such as Unreal Tournament and a score of other First Person Shooters. Surprisingly this mind control solution only costs as little as $300. Very affordable if you ask me.

Will you purchase a Neural Impulse Actuator?

100th Post!!!

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Google Phone

Oddly enough Google is trying their hand at creating a Mobile Information Device. Apple recently came out with their iPhone, so it has been purported that Google is creating their Google Phone to compete against that product in specific. If this is the case, then perhaps Google will end up creating even more computerized gadgets. They are coming into the real world instead of remaining on the internet.

Why do you think Google is creating a phone?

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

AMD vs. Intel Antitrust Case

AMD has recently accused Intel of willfully destroying evidence leading to their accountability of crimes. This is a huge mistake on the part of Intel. Deleting the very evidence that would prove them either guilty or not will only turn out badly. The court has now given Intel three weeks to retrieve all the data concerning AMD's antitrust lawsuit against them. If Intel fails to retrieve it all, it's very likely that AMD will win the case.

Should Intel's excuse for the destruction of evidence be believed?